showell@... [mailto:showell@...] wrote:
> The sarcasm was purely unindented. ;)
> This was the proposed 33.3% valid YAML:
> - zero spaces
> - but level ?? indentation
> I could see, though, how you were confused into thinking the
> scalar was the unindented piece that I was referring to.
> After all, the map, sequence, and scalar were all equally unindented.
Sorry. I thought the 33% referred to "scalar" (as opposed to map and seq).
Looking at it again I see you are right. As to whether the seq was not
indented, well, that's the question, isn't it? :-)