From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@ri...> - 2002-09-28 17:26:46
|
sh...@zi... [mailto:sh...@zi...] wrote: > The sarcasm was purely unindented. ;) > > This was the proposed 33.3% valid YAML: > > sequence > - zero spaces > - but level ?? indentation > > I could see, though, how you were confused into thinking the > scalar was the unindented piece that I was referring to. > After all, the map, sequence, and scalar were all equally unindented. Sorry. I thought the 33% referred to "scalar" (as opposed to map and seq). Looking at it again I see you are right. As to whether the seq was not indented, well, that's the question, isn't it? :-) Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |