From: john s. <js...@gm...> - 2007-04-17 01:27:41
|
hi On 4/16/07, Clark C. Evans <cc...@cl...> wrote: > you could easily define a "!!include" type and then write an > extension yourself. If it was documented well and thought through > we could include it at http://yaml.org/type/index.html this sounds like a good idea, i think it would add a lot to the language [local over-rides for config files, for instance], and could help differentiate YAML from JSON [which doesn't have this ability]. -- \js [ http://or8.net/~johns/ ] |