From: T. O. <tra...@ru...> - 2004-09-09 04:28:25
|
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 11:33 pm, Clark C. Evans wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:26:53PM -0400, T. Onoma wrote: > | --- !!rel > | ? [ a, 1 ] > | ? [ b, 2 ] > | ? [ a, 3 ] > ? [ a, 3 ] > > Would make the !!rel invalid (duplicate key), is > this what you intend? If not, the second notation, No. That would be invalid (or the duplicate ignored). Did I typo that? Or are you just asking? > | --- !!rel > | - [ a, 1 ] > | - [ b, 2 ] > | - [ a, 3 ] > > is probably the second best, or as David suggested, > using !!omap but not considering the order important. Understandably that is one way to emulate, albeit that order is implied is what's iky about it. It's the very argument that was used _for_ !!omap, as I recall. -- T. |