I think a lot of us are using it for bespoke applications and Websites; stuff that clients are waiting for, want “comprehensible” configuration (as one client of mine put it, dissing his current XML-centric app) that doesn’t add significantly to the cost/schedule for development but does give flexibility and ease of maintenance/modification. I’ve run across several projects that make use of Spyc for PHP, which I enthused over in a blog post a few weeks back at http://archlever.blogspot.com/2009/11/reuse-renew-recycle-data-structures.html.
I’d say an overall grand total of around 20 apps and sites I’ve seen using it, of which most have been in the last 12-18 months.
Hope this helps.
On 6/1/10 23:46 , "James Fisher" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I've recently fallen head-over-heels in love with YAML. Specifically, I'm thinking of configuration files -- I hate the non-standardization and slightly-different-syntax configuration files that exist for thousands of programs. I've gobbled it up for my own teensy projects.
But AFAIK, the usage/take-up of it seems way out of kilter with how much it promises and how much talk there is of it around. I've tried to find a list of //significant// applications that use YAML for config. The only ones I can find are:
* RoR (barely worth mentioning)
* Python App Engine
So, my questions: are there others? If not, why not? Is there a single example of an existing application that has made an effort to switch its config syntax to YAML? Within the context of configuration files, is there a significant competitor to YAML with the promise of standardization?
Jeff Dickey http://archlever.blogspot.com/
Phone/SMS: +65 8333 4403
Yahoo! IM: jeff_dickey
MSN IM: email@example.com (for IM only, please)
Fingerprint D367 FB97 4E59 BEC0 8EBC D8E3 3BD4 7D4C DFE0 6488
Valid from 01 July 2009 to 31 December 2009
Download from http://tr.im/qqQa