Re: [Xvrml-agents] on animation

[Jeff S. <je...@ar...>]

On Jun 28, 2005, at 11:22 PM, Miriam English wrote:


> My suggestion is to leave the interpolators so pre-existing
> work isn't broken [...] but add simpler, more sensible stuff.

I agree

> I'm not sure how to do it in xvrml, but in classic style vrml it  
> could be something like:
>
> Force {
>     intensity 0.0
>     angle 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0
>     at 0.0 0.0 0.0
>     children [
>         Group {
>             ...
>         }
>     ]
> }

so you would suggest "Force" as a grouping node?

what about adding (optional attributes with zeros for default values)
to the grouping nodes themselves?
this would eliminate adding node(s) to the spec

comments?

> I'd favor adding a mass node or attribute to all geometries.

I agree

interesting discussion...
any other people want to comment?

jeffs