Re: [xsrcg-devel] Licencing
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
murphymacleod
From: Adam B. <co...@di...> - 2004-06-19 18:30:13
|
On Jun 19, 2004, at 03:58 AM, Max Noel wrote: > > Le 17 juin 2004, =E0 05:35, Adam Brown a =E9crit : > >> A subject I have kind of been dreading to bring up, since it can push=20= >> a lot of sensitive buttons in people, but it's something we'll need=20= >> to address soon. Do you guys have any preferences or any particular=20= >> licenses you dislike? I'll just come right out and say that I'm=20 >> partial to the BSD license. My history with FreeBSD and such has sort=20= >> of brought me up under the BSD paradigm throughout my computing=20 >> career. I think there are better licenses than the GPL, which I'd=20 >> like to avoid. If anyone is dead set on a GPL-style license though,=20= >> I'd consider the LGPL. >> >> If you're familiar with any other licenses or are partial to any one=20= >> way or another, now is probably the time to get it worked out. :-) > > Well... I'm in favor of either the GPL, or the BSD license. = Although=20 > the one thing that creeps me out with BSD is that unless I'm mistaken,=20= > anyone is allowed to take our program, claim it as their own and sell=20= > it as long as we're credited in the source code (which then no one=20 > will see), right? > Not that I do expect anyone to do that, but you never know... = So, I'm=20 > neutral on this one. > Well, with all of us in a kind 'neutral' stance on this, I think that=20 might give us time to investigate some of the other licenses that are=20 either not as restrictive as the GPL or not as free as the BSD and=20 maybe find something that fits our needs best. As much as I love the BSD model, for our purposes it may not be the=20 best. Although, I don't really agree with the GPL. Jesse and I got a=20 chance to talk briefly on it and I think we came down to thinking=20 something along the lines of the LGPL or MPL. Something that keeps us=20 involved or aware of future derivative works, but doesn't restrict the=20= use of the derivative work too terribly much. Anyways, none of seems bent towards one license or another, so maybe we=20= can just leave it for later when someone finds one that seems to fit us=20= really well. -- Adam Brown co...@di... |