Re: [xSocket-develop] further proxy issues, header, cache, remove hop-by-hop headers..

[Timothy Schm. <tim...@we...>]

Hi Gregor.

> bymoving xSocket-httpto xLightweb most parts of xSocket-http have 
> beenreimplemented and code hasbeen cleaned heavily. TheremoveHopByHopHe
> aders() has not been implemented by xLightweb yet.Should xLightweb 
> support this method?

Not sure, probably not. It was just not clear to me it was fully removed. 
 
> Ihavetested heise.de with the expermintal HttpProxy implemention and 
> didnot get a404. If you send me your proxy (snippest), I will re-run 
> thetest based on yourimplementation.

In the meantime I took a deeper look at HttpProxy, in particular establishTunnel() and TcpProxyHandler, and this was the missing link for me. Things seem to work really well now.
Thank you very much.
Tim

____________________________________________________________________
Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört? 
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123