Thread: [Xsltforms-support] upload control support
Brought to you by:
alain-couthures
Menu
▾
▴
xsltforms-support
|
From: Raja <m.r...@ni...> - 2012-03-29 09:56:38
|
Hi XSLTForms members , Still XSLTForms not support the upload control. Did any one know about the latest information regarding the upload control support in the future version of XSLTForms . By -- Rajamani Marimuthu Junior Research Fellow-JRF NIC -Open Technology Centre Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai - 90 Cell : 9677192096 |
|
From: Stephen C. <ste...@gm...> - 2012-03-29 22:45:00
|
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/XRX/XSLTForms_and_eXist#Upload_file_with_XSLTForms On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Raja <m.r...@ni...> wrote: > Hi XSLTForms members , > > Still XSLTForms not support the upload control. Did any one know about the > latest information regarding the upload control support in the future > version of XSLTForms . > > By > > -- > Rajamani Marimuthu > Junior Research Fellow-JRF > NIC -Open Technology Centre > Rajaji Bhavan > Besant Nagar, > Chennai - 90 > Cell : 9677192096 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Xsltforms-support mailing list > Xsl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > > |
|
From: Raja <m.r...@ni...> - 2012-03-30 11:40:28
|
Hi Stephen Cameron !!! Yes we know that workaround with eXist-db in XRX style . But we need offline support with local save option without the exist-db and the XRX style workaround . By Rajamani</x> M NIC Gov of India On 03/30/12, Stephen Cameron <ste...@gm...> wrote: > http://en.wikibooks</x>.org/wiki/XRX/XSLTForms_and_eXist#Upload_file_with_XSLTForms > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Raja <m.r...@ni...> wrote: > > > > Hi XSLTForms members , > > > > Still XSLTForms not support the upload control. Did any one know about the latest information regarding the upload control support in the future version of XSLTForms . > > > > > > By > > > > -- > > Rajamani</x> Marimuthu > > Junior Research Fellow-JRF > > NIC -Open Technology Centre > > Rajaji Bhavan > > Besant Nagar, > > Chennai - 90 > > Cell : 9677192096 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > This SF email is sponsosred by: > > > > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xsltforms-support mailing list > > > > Xsl...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > > > > > > > > > > -- Rajamani</x> Marimuthu Junior Research Fellow-JRF NIC -Open Technology Centre Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai - 90 Cell : 9677192096 |
|
From: Alain C. <ala...@ag...> - 2012-03-30 11:46:31
|
Hello, I am currently trying to add upload control support to XSLTForms 1.0RC. This will be based on FileRead API if possible and on Java applet, if not. -Alain Le 30/03/2012 13:32, Raja a écrit : > Hi Stephen Cameron !!! > > Yes we know that workaround with eXist-db in XRX style . But we need > offline support with local save option without the exist-db and the > XRX style workaround . > > By > Rajamani</x> M > NIC > Gov of India > > On 03/30/12, *Stephen Cameron * <ste...@gm...> wrote: >> http://en.wikibooks</x>.org/wiki/XRX/XSLTForms_and_eXist#Upload_file_with_XSLTForms >> <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/XRX/XSLTForms_and_eXist#Upload_file_with_XSLTForms> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Raja <m.r...@ni... >> <mailto:m.r...@ni...>> wrote: >> >> Hi XSLTForms members , >> >> Still XSLTForms not support the upload control. Did any one know >> about the latest information regarding the upload control support >> in the future version of XSLTForms . >> >> By >> >> -- >> Rajamani</x> Marimuthu >> Junior Research Fellow-JRF >> NIC -Open Technology Centre >> Rajaji Bhavan >> Besant Nagar, >> Chennai - 90 >> Cell : 9677192096 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF email is sponsosred by: >> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure >> _______________________________________________ >> Xsltforms-support mailing list >> Xsl...@li... >> <mailto:Xsl...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support >> >> > -- > Rajamani</x> Marimuthu > Junior Research Fellow-JRF > NIC -Open Technology Centre > Rajaji Bhavan > Besant Nagar, > Chennai - 90 > Cell : 9677192096 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > > > _______________________________________________ > Xsltforms-support mailing list > Xsl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support |
|
From: Raja <m.r...@ni...> - 2012-03-30 12:28:01
|
Hi Mr Alain !!! Thanks for your quick reply .. Really we expecting a good news regarding the UPLOAD control support in XSLTForms-1.0 version . by Rajamani</x> M NIC Gov of India On 03/30/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > I am currently trying to add upload control support to XSLTForms 1.0RC. > > This will be based on FileRead API if possible and on Java applet, if not. > > -Alain > > Le 30/03/2012 13:32, Raja a écrit : > > > Hi Stephen Cameron !!! > > > > Yes we know that workaround with eXist-db in XRX style . But we need offline support with local save option without the exist-db and the XRX style workaround . > > > > By > > Rajamani</x> M > > NIC > > Gov of India > > > > On 03/30/12, Stephen Cameron <ste...@gm...> <ste...@gm...> wrote: > > > http://en.wikibooks</x>.org/wiki/XRX/XSLTForms_and_eXist#Upload_file_with_XSLTForms > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Raja <m.r...@ni...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi XSLTForms members , > > > > > > > > Still XSLTForms not support the upload control. Did any one know about the latest information regarding the upload control support in the future version of XSLTForms . > > > > > > > > By > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Rajamani</x> Marimuthu > > > > Junior Research Fellow-JRF > > > > NIC -Open Technology Centre > > > > Rajaji Bhavan > > > > Besant Nagar, > > > > Chennai - 90 > > > > Cell : 9677192096 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > This SF email is sponsosred by: > > > > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xsltforms-support mailing list > > > > Xsl...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Rajamani</x> Marimuthu > > Junior Research Fellow-JRF > > NIC -Open Technology Centre > > Rajaji Bhavan > > Besant Nagar, > > Chennai - 90 > > Cell : 9677192096 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF email is sponsosred by: > > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xsltforms-support mailing list > > Xsl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > > > > > > > -- Rajamani</x> Marimuthu Junior Research Fellow-JRF NIC -Open Technology Centre Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai - 90 Cell : 9677192096 |
|
From: Alain C. <ala...@ag...> - 2012-03-30 12:53:17
|
Hello Raja, In terms of priority, which ones of data bindings (base64Binary, hexBinary or anyURI) would you need? Is it a problem for you if a Java applet is mandatory?? Thanks! -Alain Le 30/03/2012 14:27, Raja a écrit : > Hi Mr Alain !!! > Thanks for your quick reply .. Really we expecting a good news > regarding the UPLOAD control support in XSLTForms-1.0 version . > > by > Rajamani</x> M > NIC > Gov of India > |
|
From: Raja <m.r...@ni...> - 2012-04-02 05:44:59
|
Hi Mr Alain !!!! That base64Binary is primary one for us and yes the applet based method will create some additional time delay to render the form and it's not an unique method to support the same .. Some native support in the XSLTForms engine is much appreciated instead of the applet method . Thanks for your kind reply . By Rajamani M Gov of India On 03/30/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote: > > > > > Hello Raja, > > In terms of priority, which ones of data bindings (base64Binary, hexBinary or anyURI) would you need? > > Is it a problem for you if a Java applet is mandatory?? > > Thanks! > > -Alain > > Le 30/03/2012 14:27, Raja a écrit : > > > Hi Mr Alain !!! > > Thanks for your quick reply .. Really we expecting a good news regarding the UPLOAD control support in XSLTForms-1.0 version . > > > > by > > Rajamani</x> M > > NIC > > Gov of India > > > > > > > > > -- Rajamani Marimuthu Junior Research Fellow-JRF NIC -Open Technology Centre Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai - 90 Cell : 9677192096 |
|
From: Alain C. <ala...@ag...> - 2012-04-03 17:19:55
|
Hello Raja, I have implemented upload control support in rev.537. It is based on FileReader API, which is supported by all recent browsers except IE, and a Java applet for others. Thank you for your feedbacks! -Alain Le 02/04/2012 07:44, Raja a écrit : > Hi Mr Alain !!!! > > That base64Binary is primary one for us and yes the applet based > method will create some additional time delay to render the form and > it's not an unique method to support the same .. Some native support > in the XSLTForms engine is much appreciated instead of the applet > method . Thanks for your kind reply . > > By > Rajamani M > Gov of India > |
|
From: <st...@sa...> - 2012-04-02 15:47:08
|
> On 03/30/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote: > > Is it a problem for you if a Java applet is mandatory?? I suspect this question of yours may be connected to the fact that with RC1 every new form load either asks me if it is OK to give access to the applet or goes straight to a file-browse dialogue (this is with FF 9.0.1/Mac OS X). In case this behaviour I am seeing is not a well-known bug, you can see it at: http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/dcclt/launch/p3 I would like it to be possible to load forms without having this behaviour. I'd be fine with having the behaviour controlled by setting some kind of option somewhere. Upload is a very useful facility when needed but many (most?) forms won't need it. Steve |
|
From: <st...@sa...> - 2012-04-02 17:49:17
|
Looking at this some more, I think maybe the new upload control is
interacting in an undesirable way with submissions like:
<xforms:submission
id="htmlTitle"
method="get"
serialization="none"
replace="none"
resource="javascript:setTitle()"/>
In the form in question, this is called on xforms-ready:
<xforms:action ev:event="xforms-ready">
<xforms:send submission="htmlTitle"/>
I think that what happens is that the permit-applet dialogue
appears the first time the xsltforms.js is loaded after browser
cache is cleared, then the javascript resource submission pops
up the file-picker dialogue (erroneously, since there is no
upload going on there).
After the first time, the file-picker pops up whenever a js
resource submission is done--if you click on a text item in the
right pane, then on the 'Hide Outline'/'Show Outline' control
in my xform, you also get the file-picker dialogue.
Steve
Quoting st...@sa...:
>> On 03/30/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote:
>>
>> Is it a problem for you if a Java applet is mandatory??
>
> I suspect this question of yours may be connected to the fact that
> with RC1 every new form load either asks me if it is OK to give access
> to the applet or goes straight to a file-browse dialogue (this is with
> FF 9.0.1/Mac OS X). In case this behaviour I am seeing is not a
> well-known bug, you can see it at:
>
> http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/dcclt/launch/p3
>
|
|
From: Alain C. <ala...@ag...> - 2012-04-03 17:22:33
|
Hello Steve, A wrong copy/taste in source code and "javascript:" was not anymore well supported. Please tell me if it's correct now with rev.537 (I don't have a test case ready for that so I just changed an instruction!) Thanks! -Alain Le 02/04/2012 19:49, st...@sa... a écrit : > Looking at this some more, I think maybe the new upload control is > interacting in an undesirable way with submissions like: > > <xforms:submission > id="htmlTitle" > method="get" > serialization="none" > replace="none" > resource="javascript:setTitle()"/> > > In the form in question, this is called on xforms-ready: > > <xforms:action ev:event="xforms-ready"> > <xforms:send submission="htmlTitle"/> > > I think that what happens is that the permit-applet dialogue > appears the first time the xsltforms.js is loaded after browser > cache is cleared, then the javascript resource submission pops > up the file-picker dialogue (erroneously, since there is no > upload going on there). > > After the first time, the file-picker pops up whenever a js > resource submission is done--if you click on a text item in the > right pane, then on the 'Hide Outline'/'Show Outline' control > in my xform, you also get the file-picker dialogue. > > Steve > > Quoting st...@sa...: > >>> On 03/30/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote: >>> >>> Is it a problem for you if a Java applet is mandatory?? >> >> I suspect this question of yours may be connected to the fact that >> with RC1 every new form load either asks me if it is OK to give access >> to the applet or goes straight to a file-browse dialogue (this is with >> FF 9.0.1/Mac OS X). In case this behaviour I am seeing is not a >> well-known bug, you can see it at: >> >> http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/dcclt/launch/p3 >> > > > |
|
From: <st...@sa...> - 2012-04-04 16:24:59
|
Quoting Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...>: > Hello Steve, > > A wrong copy/taste in source code and "javascript:" was not anymore > well supported. > > Please tell me if it's correct now with rev.537 (I don't have a test > case ready for that so I just changed an instruction!) Yep, all happy now with r537. The JAR is no longer loaded unnecessarily, there are no file-picker dialogues, and the javascript submissions execute properly. Thanks for the prompt fix! Steve |
|
From: Raja <m.r...@ni...> - 2012-04-04 07:08:33
|
Hi Mr Alain !!! Great Work really working well (Upload Control) and tested the latest rev537 build of XSLTForms. Now almost full support of XForms1.1 from XSLTForms ... Wow. Thanks and Regards Rajamani M NIC Gov of India On 04/03/12, Alain Couthures <ala...@ag...> wrote: > Hello Raja, > > I have implemented upload control support in rev.537. It is based on FileReader API, which is supported by all recent browsers except IE, and a Java applet for others. > > Thank you for your feedbacks! > > -Alain > > Le 02/04/2012 07:44, Raja a écrit : > >Hi Mr Alain !!!! > > > > That base64Binary is primary one for us and yes the applet based method will create some additional time delay to render the form and it's not an unique method to support the same .. Some native support in the XSLTForms engine is much appreciated instead of the applet method . Thanks for your kind reply . > > > >By > >Rajamani M > >Gov of India > > > > > -- Rajamani Marimuthu Junior Research Fellow-JRF NIC -Open Technology Centre Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai - 90 Cell : 9677192096 |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X