Re: [Xsltforms-support] Using insert where both source and destination contain bindings
Brought to you by:
alain-couthures
|
From: Alain C. <ala...@ag...> - 2011-11-29 20:31:24
|
Hi Gordon, Rev. 520 xsltforms.js doesn't contain any Core.<method>... Did you really upgrade to it?? -Alain Le 29/11/2011 14:59, Gordon Rogers a écrit : > > Hi Alain > > Thanks for the prompt feedback, I'm in the process of upgrading my > version of xsltforms and it does indeed solve this bug. In passing I > noticed a few places in xsltforms.js where you're still using > Core.<method> rather than XsltForms_browser.<method>, I can't > contribute the changes I've made unfortunately as we've added some > custom code in places within the js file so it wouldn't be compatible. > > Thanks, > Gordon > > *From:*Alain Couthures [mailto:ala...@ag...] > *Sent:* 26 November 2011 21:26 > *To:* Gordon Rogers > *Cc:* xsl...@li... > *Subject:* Re: [Xsltforms-support] Using insert where both source and > destination contain bindings > > Hi Gordon, > > I didn't get any error with the latest trunk revision in the SF SVN > repository (this is not yet the 1.0RC but it's close to it!). > > Thank you for your feedbacks! > > -Alain > > Le 25/11/2011 10:43, Gordon Rogers a écrit : > > Hi > > I've recently upgraded my version of xsltforms to the latest release > and have started to receive the error message -- "Two binds affect one > node ..." this is thrown from within XFBind.prototype.refresh and > occurs when I'm doing an xf:insert with bindings in place for both the > source and the destination. The insert appears to work regardless of > the error message being thrown, so I'm not sure of the value in making > the validation check. > > I've attached a simple example that recreates the error and is based > on the deep-copy.xml example distributed with xsltforms.js. > > Is there an obvious fix to this problem? My initial thought was to > remove the validation check locally, but I'm not sure of the > underlying reason for introducing that check. Is a repeat a special > case where the check has no meaning? > > Thanks, > > Gordon > > *Gordon Rogers* > > Senior Developer > > Corelogic Limited > > www.corelogic.co.uk <http://www.corelogic.co.uk/> > > Tel: 0131 550 0447 > > Email _go...@co... > <mailto:gor...@co...>_ > > This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is > intended, and its contents are private and confidential. If you > receive this email message in error, notify the sender immediately and > do not disclose, copy or distribute this message, or open any attachments > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xsltforms-support mailing list > Xsl...@li... <mailto:Xsl...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > |