[Xsltforms-support] [Fwd: correction to previous datetime change suggestions]
Brought to you by:
alain-couthures
Menu
▾
▴
[Xsltforms-support] [Fwd: correction to previous datetime change suggestions]
|
From: Stephen C. <Ste...@ut...> - 2009-09-27 13:01:45
|
oops, ignore last email, should be as follows
"dateTime" : {
"patterns" : [
"^([12][0-9]{3})-(0[1-9]|1[012])-(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])T([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\\.[0-9]+)?(Z|[+-]([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9])?$"
],
"class" : "datetime",
"displayLength" : 20,
"format" : function(value) {
//SC return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value, "yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"));
return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value,
"yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"),null,true);
},
"parse" : function(value) {
//SC return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value),
"yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss");
return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value),
"yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss", true);
}
},
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: correction to previous datetime change suggestions
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:54:04 +1000
From: Stephen Cameron <ste...@ut...>
To: xsl...@li...
My previous changes (see below) broke the datetime validation. The
following single change seem to do the trick though.
"dateTime" : {
"patterns" : [
"^([12][0-9]{3})-(0[1-9]|1[012])-(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])T([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\\.[0-9]+)?(Z|[+-]([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9])?$"
],
"class" : "datetime",
"displayLength" : 20,
"format" : function(value) {
//SC return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value, "yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"));
return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value,
"yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"),null,true);
},
"parse" : function(value) {
return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value),
"yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss");
}
},
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: datetime change suggestions
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:39:46 +1000
From: Stephen Cameron <ste...@ut...>
To: COUTHURES Alain <ala...@ag...>,
xsl...@li...
Hello Alain,
I am back after a couple of weeks holiday.
I have been looking at my datetime format problems today and have some
change suggestions to make. It seems to be working now for me at least,
but I am not sure of the implications of the changes.
The changes are in two places but both relate to the use of the
I8N.format function.
This is as follows unchanged:
format : function(date, pattern, loc) {
if (!date) {
return "";
}
if (!pattern) { pattern = I8N.get("format.datetime"); }
var str = I8N._format(pattern, date.getDate(), "dd");
str = I8N._format(str, (loc ? date.getMonth() :
date.getUTCMonth()) + 1, "MM");
y = (loc ? date.getFullYear() : date.getUTCFullYear());
str = I8N._format(str, y < 1000? 1900 + y : y, "yyyy");
str = I8N._format(str, (loc ? date.getSeconds() :
date.getUTCSeconds()), "ss");
str = I8N._format(str, (loc ? date.getMinutes() :
date.getUTCMinutes()), "mm");
str = I8N._format(str, (loc ? date.getHours() :
date.getUTCHours()), "hh");
o = date.getTimezoneOffset();
str = I8N._format(str, (loc ? (o < 0 ? "+" :
"-")+zeros(Math.floor(Math.abs(o)/60),2)+":"+zeros(Math.abs(o) % 60,2) :
"Z"), "zz");
return str;
},
The "loc" parameter should by rights be boolean and determines if the
time is local or not, if it is false or null then as you can see the UTC
functions get called. In my case this subtracts 10 hours from the date
that I entered. There is no adjustment for timezone made, probably as I
don't have a timezone (zz) in my date format string.
In general I want to the date entered to be considered a local time.
Changes are as follows with my initials SC:
1. In the TypeDefs.Default object on about line 4731:
"dateTime" : {
"patterns" : [
"^([12][0-9]{3})-(0[1-9]|1[012])-(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])T([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:[0-5][0-9](\\.[0-9]+)?(Z|[+-]([01][0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9])?$"
],
"class" : "datetime",
"displayLength" : 20,
"format" : function(value) {
//SC return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value, "yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss"));
return I8N.format(value, null, true);
},
"parse" : function(value) {
//SC return I8N.format(I8N.parse(value), "yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ss");
return I8N.parse(value);
}
},
These force the datetime pattern to be taken from the
messages.properties file and for the time to be considered local.
2. In the Calendar 'handler' function starting on about line 4042:
if (cal.isTimestamp) {
//SC added next line, not sure why it should be missing??
date.setSeconds(cal.inputSec.value);
date.setMinutes(cal.inputMin.value);
date.setHours(cal.inputHour.value);
//SC cal.input.value = I8N.format(date);
cal.input.value = I8N.format(date,null,true);
} else {
cal.input.value = I8N.formatDate(date);
}
I've not checked changed any of the date parse/format functions but
these need checking as well.
Maybe I have missed some essential point and these changes aren't needed
(but probably not).
Cheers
Steve Cameron
--
Regards
Stephen Cameron
Data Programmer
Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS)
eMarine Information Infrastructure Project
University of Tasmania, Private Bag 21, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
Tel: +61 3 6226 8507
Fax: +61 3 6226 2997
Email: ste...@ut...
URL: http://www.imos.org.au/eMII.html
--
Regards
Stephen Cameron
Data Programmer
Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS)
eMarine Information Infrastructure Project
University of Tasmania, Private Bag 21, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
Tel: +61 3 6226 8507
Fax: +61 3 6226 2997
Email: ste...@ut...
URL: http://www.imos.org.au/eMII.html
--
Regards
Stephen Cameron
Data Programmer
Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS)
eMarine Information Infrastructure Project
University of Tasmania, Private Bag 21, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
Tel: +61 3 6226 8507
Fax: +61 3 6226 2997
Email: ste...@ut...
URL: http://www.imos.org.au/eMII.html
|
