RE: [Xpipe-developers] FW: [xml-dev] Check out the pipeline submi ssion

[Michael B. <Mic...@Al...>]

Cool! This proposal looks pretty good to me, although there are some fuzzy
areas.

One thing I wasn't clear on is if I can parameterize all of the inputs and
outputs. It uses URIs for these and the only thing that seems to be passed
in from the application context is the target. (Or at least that's what the
note says, though in looking at the examples, it didn't seem evident to me
that the target was really an external parameter.) I'd like to have
something like this where the pipeline def is a model that does not specify
hard-coded paths (except perhaps for temporary intermediate files), and lets
me specify the concrete inputs and target at runtime, not just the target.

It doesn't seem to permit that in its current formulation, unless I've
misread it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean McGrath
To: Michael Brennan; xpi...@li...
Sent: 3/1/02 2:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Xpipe-developers] FW: [xml-dev] Check out the pipeline
submission

Michael,

The company I work for,  Propylon, are involved with this W3C submission

and I hope to be able to get involved
in whatever W3C activities come from it.

http://www.w3.org/Submission/2002/01/Comment


Sean