|
From: Sean M. <sea...@pr...> - 2002-01-30 15:34:30
|
At 10:19 30/01/2002 -0500, David Starr wrote: >No Worries. AS I mentioned, the execution portion is pretty much there for >proof of concept. I had finished the object model that I said I would write >and wanted to try a few things out. The object model is still there and >fully functional, simply ignore all of the classes derived from XComponent >and the XComponentFactory. > >I saw your note indicating that you were going to try and integrate some of >this stuff. I'm not sure that it fits well yet. Can you give me a roadmap >of how you see stitching things together. Then I can probably help neaten >up some of the stuff I've written to ease the integration. If I hear from >you I can try and get a few hours in today. Then I'm off to client sites >for the next few days and will be pretty swamped. What I'd like to do is to put the XComponent Object Model stuff in now. I'm running through the stuff now. Hope to have in CVS later today. I've moved the process related stuff[1] into an archive for the moment. Sean [1] 21/01/2002 21:35 1,995 JavaXComponent.java 21/01/2002 21:41 1,393 PythonXComponent.java 20/01/2002 20:22 1,141 XComponentClassLoader.java 21/01/2002 21:41 1,327 XSLTXComponent.java |