From: Dan C. <da...@ch...> - 2006-02-09 16:14:28
|
+1 )_( Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wes Biggs" <we...@ca...> To: <xor...@li...> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:11 AM Subject: [Xorm-devel] XORM major revisions > I'm thinking of switching XORM future development to have the following > dependencies: > > * Add requirement for JDK 1.5 and clean up code in ways this allows > * Add requirement for JDO 2.0, now that there is an API JAR available. > Most of the 2.0 methods would be initially non-functional, but some key > ones, like PersistenceManager.newInstance(), would replace XORM > proprietary methods where applicable. > * Include the POJQ project for compilable queries. This would replace the > experimental CodeQuery framework in XORM today, and remove the need for > BCEL. > > These changes should all be backward compatible for users, provided that > they recompile against the JDO2 jar (which alters the argument types and > return types of some methods). > > I don't see XORM being a particularly active project, or hoping to surpass > much larger open source projects like JPOX (the JDO 2.0 reference > implementation) in terms of overall implementation of the JDO spec, but > this allows us to align its usage with the features that have been > standardized in JDO 2 and maintain focus on implementing those features > which we feel are most important and applicable to our projects, or those > that we're interesting in looking at from an experimental point of view. > > Thoughts? > > Wes > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Xorm-devel mailing list > Xor...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xorm-devel > |