|
From: Wes B. <we...@ca...> - 2005-10-10 09:55:08
|
Harry Evans wrote: >The JCache version gives you 1 big cache, with objects being copied >around as needed. > That's sort of annoying, especially if you have applications that use partially (but not fully) overlapping sets of tables. I suppose it's an implementation detail on the cache layer, but I agree it doesn't sound that flexible for all kinds of distributed JDO systems. > >I could really use some input on the approach to take, as I can see >the value in each, and not enough discriminating factors to choose >either one. > > Thanks for doing the analysis. I think that an eviction-notice-only approach would be a good lightweight starting point. XORM's all about doing things differently, anyway. Wes |