Re: [Xorm-devel] XORM and JDO 2.0

[<ogn...@ya...>]

> That is, 
> I will invest in making the RI an open,
> pluggable architecture that 
> allows us to do some of the more interesting
> things that have evolved in 
> XORM, such as mapping abstract/interface
> properties and query methods, 
> writing code-based queries, and using runtime
> instead of compile-time 
> class enhancement.  The overall goal would be
> to provide a GPLed product 
> built on top of the ASL core that is both JDO
> 2.0 compliant (passes the 
> TCK) and includes unique features.
> 
> If you could respond with a vote on (a) whether
> you think this is a 
> reasonable approach and (b) whether you would
> be willing to commit to 
> helping with a JDO 2.0 RI, that would be great.
Hi Wes,
I  vote yes on b
About the a i think that XORM is only a starting
point, because it requires we to write wrapping
classes to properly map objects in many
situations. 
And we must define when runtime enhancement is
more useful versus more efficient compile-time 
class enhancement.
Interface enhancement in xorm view is not the
enhancement of all classes wich implements that
interface but is the creation at run time of a
class that implements that interface and haven't
any particular behavieour.
I think we must still work on this.
However i'm still interested in helping the
developent of the RI
Regards
 Dimitri Ognibene


	

	
		
____________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Companion - Scarica gratis la toolbar di Ricerca di Yahoo! 
http://companion.yahoo.it