From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-07-16 02:17:20
|
Bugs item #3515996, was opened at 2012-04-08 21:59 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cesag You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=3515996&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.5.x >Status: Closed Resolution: Postponed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Cesag (cesag) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mail_template Initial Comment: Replace {SITENAME} - ({SITEURL}) webmaster {ADMINMAIL} with {X_SITENAME} ({X_SITEURL}) webmaster {X_ADMINMAIL} in these other files : htdocs\language\english\mail_template\lostpass1.tpl htdocs\language\english\mail_template\lostpass2.tpl htdocs\language\english\mail_template\register.tpl htdocs\language\english\mail_template\tellfriend.tpl htdocs\modules\profile\language\english\mail_template\emailchanged.tpl see here for more details : http://xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=345563#forumpost345563 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Beck (beckmi) Date: 2012-04-15 17:00 Message: We'll focus on name consistency and code clean-up in XOOPS 2.6.0. In XOOPS 2.5.5 we want to focus mainly on bugs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cesag (cesag) Date: 2012-04-15 16:57 Message: ok I'll test again and I tell you later ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Beck (beckmi) Date: 2012-04-15 16:54 Message: Is this a bug, or is it working, but has a different definition? For example, SITENAME in lostpassword.php: It is defined in lostpassword.php: $xoopsMailer->assign("SITENAME", $xoopsConfig['sitename']); and then used in the template: {SITENAME} ({SITEURL}) So it is working. It's not consistent, but if it is working, it is not a bug, correct? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cesag (cesag) Date: 2012-04-15 16:49 Message: This is not serious. I found the bugs, I provided the details and you prefer to wait Xoops 2.6?! see here : http://xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=345563#forumpost345563 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Beck (beckmi) Date: 2012-04-15 16:20 Message: We'll address it in XOOPS 2.6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=3515996&group_id=41586 |