Re: [Xoops-development] Re: ping

[Martin K. <Mar...@bl...>]

"K. Ono" <on...@xo...> writes on 
Wed, 04 Jun 2003 02:23:18 +0200 (METDST):

> 
> I have not received the object handler wrapper codes yet though, so
> maybe this is what we should discuss in detail here? ;-)


I have posted some updates in the forum. But I guess it'd be better to repost a full version here (in a different mail).


> Currently, there is no detailed roadmap other than the one on the wiki
> site (though that doesn't look like a good one), and the development
> has virtually stopped due to the lack of time for developers to code,
> but we will accept patches and give out commit access to active
> contributors as needed.


Ok, then I continue posting as my own time permits. Though some of my ideas would rather fit into rather into 2.1 than the current code. Could we have a new CVS repository for 2.1? Perhaps without any modules, so new ideas like "super-sections" can be ported bit by bit?

Masi