[Xoops-development] Re: ping

[K. O. <on...@xo...>]

Hi,

I am sorry for the late response. I didn't know that the ML Administrator
doesn't get signed up automatically to the ML. ;-p

I've seen your patches and posts at the forums, and some of them I have
merged
with the codes on CVS, some of them I haven't had the time to take a look in
detail..
I have not received the object handler wrapper codes yet though, so maybe
this is
what we should discuss in detail here? ;-)

Currently, there is no detailed roadmap other than the one on the wiki site
(though that doesn't look like a good one), and the development has
virtually stopped due to the lack of time for developers to code, but we
will accept patches and give out commit access to active contributors as
needed.

Thanks and regards,
K. Ono

----- Original Message -----
From: "K. Ono" <on...@xo...>
To: <on...@xo...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:01 AM
Subject: ping


> Hi!
>
>  I subsrcibed a while ago and thought I'd lurk a bit. Is something wrong
or
> is this a very
> low-traffic list? Fact is I got no mail since my subscription on May 15.
>
>  It might have been noticed I am playing busy body at the XOOPS site. I
have
> already posted
> or filed some enhancements (or what I percieve them to be) of the XOOPS
> code. My goals are
> convenience for module authors and a code clean up (more OO, less
includes).
>
>  Is there still anyone out there? Anyone interesting in getting work done
in
> that direction?
>
>  If yes, I'd be glad if anyone could point out the general directions and
> plans for 2.1 and
> beyond.
>
>  Thanx and regards,
>  Masi
>
>