Re: [XNap-Commons-Devel] Completion

[Chris M. <ch...@st...>]

Yeah Foxtrot not JFoxtrot. Strandz has stuck with Foxtrot and never used Spin. 
Spin acknowleges that the original idea came from Foxtrot.

http://foxtrot.sourceforge.net/
http://spin.sourceforge.net/

I'm afraid I don't really have much insight for this group as to which solution 
is better.

Steffen Pingel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
>>What does XNap-Commons standardize on for threading ("some kind of
>>asynchronous implementation")? 
> 
> 
> Currently nothing, as we didn't have a need for threading so far :).
> 
> 
>>I have used JFoxtrot; it works well and it 
>>is being actively developed, but there is also Spin.
> 
> 
> I have used Foxtrot as well and liked it a lot. Spin I have heard of but never 
> used. I guess it is up to whom ever uses a threading first. If applicable I 
> would certainly look into using Foxtrot.
> 
> Does Spin have any particular advantage? Could you provide a link with more 
> information on Spin?
> 
> Steffen
> 


-- 
www.strandz.org

The 'least code' framework.