From: Luis M. <lui...@ne...> - 2004-01-20 04:40:26
|
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 03:16, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > :)) Never buyed a car. But I know how the new computer smells... It's=20 > amasing. Indeed. I also like the smell of new leather-like sofas :) > Try JAJC. It is well designed and well written client with proprietary > license. It is copied free but non-free since no source code comes with i= t. Yes, it's a nice program. But it doesn't run on linux and it's not free. So= =20 it's not particularly tempting, as there are other programs of the same=20 quality. > Do not sure. I have not ever read LGPL :) If you will found that this is > illegal - leave me a note - I will replace all jabberpy code with mine. > But I am think that it is legal. Free license (LGPL) allows derived > products to be less free than itself. I will be very surprised if it > prevents the over case - where the derived product is more free (GPL). You seem to be right indeed: """3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public=20 License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do this,= =20 you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so that they ref= er=20 to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2, instead of to this=20 License. (If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General=20 Public License has appeared, then you can specify that version instead if y= ou=20 wish.) Do not make any other change in these notices.=20 Once this change is made in a given copy, it is irreversible for that copy,= so=20 the ordinary GNU General Public License applies to all subsequent copies an= d=20 derivative works made from that copy.""" So let's hope xmpppy bolsters a lot of high grade GPL programs. Let's hope= =20 such programs are so good that no proprietary program could ever even start= =20 to tempt us! :) As someone else would say, Jabber on! =2D-=20 Lu=EDs Marques |