Re: Direction

[<ma...@ev...>]

>>>>> "M" == Mike808  <mi...@ne...> writes:

    M> Heavily modifying the maint release,

[...]

    M> The indentation should be consistent, the style should look
    M> more organized, and the documentation tweaked.

All these are good points, but I have to ask: have you looked at my
0.30 pre-release or read the POD that comes with it?

I've done a small amount of documenting of the code there, but have
also done a substantial bit of work on the POD -- cleaning up the API,
documenting un-documented calls, etc.

This is stuff that should be merged because it has already been
announced.  I put the POD out for review and got at least Geert's ok.
I'd like to think that work isn't going to waste.

Also, note that committing changes that simply change the indention
will make the code un-mergeable.  If we are working to merge the
-maint branch with the main trunk, then it would be a good idea to
avoid the indention for now and wait till we get the branches merged
back in.

Mark.

-- 
The worst thing about new books is that they keep us from reading the old
ones. -Joseph Joubert (1754-1824)