RE: [xmlWiki-developers] Re: Servlet Testing

[HEISTAD,CHRIS (A-USA,ex2) <chr...@ag...>]

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Hugo Garcia [mailto:xm...@ne...]
-> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:58 PM
-> To: xml...@li...
-> Subject: [xmlWiki-developers] Re: Servlet Testing
-> 
-> 
-> I have experience with both. More with Cactus than HttpUnit.
-> 
-> If Chris is reading this then maybe he could email you the 
-> acceptance 
-> test that we have been working on.
-> 
-> The only tricky part of cactus is setting it up. Once that 
-> is done then 
-> it is a matter of just doing regular unit tests using the junit 
-> framework. This link is a very good intro that gives you the basic 
-> working knowledge to write unitTests :
-> 
-> http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/cookbook/cookbook.htm
-> 
-> The nice thing about Cactus is that you can do real unit 
-> testing within 
-> the servlet container. You also have access to the HttpResponse and 
-> HttpRequest objects of the servlet being tested so that those can be 
-> tested to. On the other hand HttpUnit does not run in the servlet 
-> container (although there is a way of doing so). What it is 
-> good for is 
-> for veryfying the input and output of a web app thus its 
-> usefullness in 
-> doing Acceptance tests for web apps.
-> 
-> -H
-> 
-> rd...@ly... wrote:
-> 
-> > Hi, Hugo.
-> > 
-> > I am trying to create my first "Preview" page, something 
-> basic.According to XP rule "test then write code", I should 
-> have some test for this servlet.Are we gonna use HHTPUnit or 
-> Cactus for tests?Do you have experience with both and maybe 
-> you can give us some directions?
-> > 
-> > Thank you.
-> > 
-> > Radu
-> > 
-> > 
-> > 
-> > 
-> 
-> 
-> 
-> _______________________________________________
-> xmlWiki-developers mailing list
-> xml...@li...
-> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlwiki-developers
->