Re: [Xmlunit-general] Documentation

[Stefan B. <bo...@ap...>]

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, James Abley <jam...@gm...> wrote:

> What about tooling support? Editors with good XML support are fairly
> ubiquitous; presumably there are similar things for LaTeX available
> both to emacs / vi and to other editors?

Emacs has AucTex (which I've been using for about twelve years now
8-), and there even are visual editors for TeX[1], but I never tried
them.

While at a former job I wrote an Ant task to run LaTeX (as often as
needed), I should be able to re-invent it rather quickly.

Creating HTML or XSL:FO from docbook is a matter of running XSLT which
is trivial using Ant.  Apache FOP comes with an Ant task to create PDF
(and RTF?) from FO.

> I'll have a look at what's currently in CVS with a view to
> contributing a DocBook version of some of it,

Maybe you could just start with a section or two like I did for the
LaTeX case.  That way we may have a basis to compare things.

Stefan

Footnotes: 
[1]  for example http://www.lyx.org/