Re: [Xmlunit-general] Making XMLTestCase abstract?

[James A. <jam...@gm...>]

+1

On 31/01/07, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@ap...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a Feature Request to make XMLTestCase abstract since
> Eclipse's (and probably other's) TestRunner sees the class and tries
> to run it as a test suite, which fails because it doesn't contain any
> test cases.
>
> I turned down the issue with "can't do it because of backwards
> compatibility" but after having second and third thoughts I favor
> making the class abstract now.
>
> If people extend XMLTestCase they won't be hurt and anybody who
> creates an instance of XMLTestCase most likely should better use
> XMLAssert.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Stefan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Xmlunit-general mailing list
> Xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlunit-general
>