Re: [Xmlunit-general] Custom Exceptions in .NET?

[Филимонов М. С. <tpa...@gm...>]

Hi Stefan.
I think maybe there is some additional value in wrapping  
SystemExceptions into XmlUnit exceptions:
1) We would be more decoupled from .net if we will wrap our exceptions  
with XmlUnit exception and can share code between java/.net in high  
level easily.
2) Not sure about this, but as i understood IOException can't be  
wrapper as Assertion Exception , maybe we will need some kind of  
functionality in future and it's nice to have such possibility IMO.
3) Will be much easier to share tests , remember your idea , huh ? :)

Also i want to suggest use another class not XMLUnit Exception maybe  
something like XMLUnitPersistanceException or something like that.
12.05.2009, в 8:09, Stefan Bodewig написал(а):

> Hi,
>
> I've implemented some basic builders for the most common input sources
> in trunk (both platforms).
>
> For the Java versions I've not yet wrapped the exceptions that may be
> thrown into XMLUnit-specific RuntimeException but will do so like I
> did in XMLUnit 1.x.
>
> For the .NET code the main reason for XMLUnit's own exception classes
> (checked exceptions) doesn't exist.  Is there still some additional
> value in wrapping exceptions in XMLUnit exceptions or do we simply not
> handle exceptions like XmlException or IOException at all?
>
> Stefan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!  
> Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but  
> thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW  
> KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Xmlunit-general mailing list
> Xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlunit-general