xmlstar-devel

[Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Noam P. <npo...@us...>]

I just released version 1.1.0

    - bug fix for BSD/OSX: check that O_BINARY is declared before
      #including io.h (Bug 3211822)
    - select improvements
      - add --elif and --else options
      - sorting on multiple fields
      - correct (for English) lexical sorting instead of ASCIIbetical
      - only outputs namespaces that are actually used
      - only outputs xsl:param inputFile if it's used
      - don't make separate templates if there is only 1
    - link to shared libxml and libxslt libraries by default
    - add library version info to --version output
    - add directory argument for ls; exit status indicates
      failure/success instead of file count
    - stop using old SAX1 interface, xmlstarlet will now link with a
      libxml configured --without-sax1 and --without-legacy

Noam

Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Aleksandar I. <ale...@iv...>]

Hi,

Sorry I've missed a few versions, real life got in the way :(
I have uploaded RHEL/CentOS5 RPMS for 1.1.0 now.

I will also send a suggestion to rpmforge so that it carries it, for a 
bit more visibility.

regards,

On 04/04/2011 02:04 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> I just released version 1.1.0
>
>      - bug fix for BSD/OSX: check that O_BINARY is declared before
>        #including io.h (Bug 3211822)
>      - select improvements
>        - add --elif and --else options
>        - sorting on multiple fields
>        - correct (for English) lexical sorting instead of ASCIIbetical
>        - only outputs namespaces that are actually used
>        - only outputs xsl:param inputFile if it's used
>        - don't make separate templates if there is only 1
>      - link to shared libxml and libxslt libraries by default
>      - add library version info to --version output
>      - add directory argument for ls; exit status indicates
>        failure/success instead of file count
>      - stop using old SAX1 interface, xmlstarlet will now link with a
>        libxml configured --without-sax1 and --without-legacy
>
> Noam
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> _______________________________________________
> xmlstar-devel mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlstar-devel
>

Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Noam P. <npo...@us...>]

Aleksandar Ivanisevic <ale...@iv...> writes:

> I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a 
> patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a 
> political issue I've missed?

A political issue about the binary name or about using rpmforge? Either
way I don't think there is. If you, as a Redhat user, think that using
the rpmforge packages make sense, then I guess we should do that.

Noam

Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Aleksandar I. <ale...@iv...>]

On 04/05/2011 02:58 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> Aleksandar Ivanisevic<ale...@iv...>  writes:
>
>> I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a
>> patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a
>> political issue I've missed?
>
> A political issue about the binary name or about using rpmforge? Either

Both, don't know ;)

> way I don't think there is. If you, as a Redhat user, think that using
> the rpmforge packages make sense, then I guess we should do that.

Probably a note in the README or something along those lines should 
suffice, but I could continue creating packages, its really only < 10 
mins work to rebuild. I think Dag Wieers, the master of rpmforge 
personally uses xmlstarlet so it gets updated there really fast.

Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Aleksandar I. <ale...@iv...>]

Hm, don't know where I was looking but rpmforge already contains 
xmlstarlet and they are pretty good in updating it, i.e. they have 
already pushed 1.0.1. update this morning when I asked.

I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a 
patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a 
political issue I've missed?

On 04/04/2011 10:53 AM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I've missed a few versions, real life got in the way :(
> I have uploaded RHEL/CentOS5 RPMS for 1.1.0 now.
>
> I will also send a suggestion to rpmforge so that it carries it, for a
> bit more visibility.
>
> regards,
>
> On 04/04/2011 02:04 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
>> I just released version 1.1.0
>>
>> - bug fix for BSD/OSX: check that O_BINARY is declared before
>> #including io.h (Bug 3211822)
>> - select improvements
>> - add --elif and --else options
>> - sorting on multiple fields
>> - correct (for English) lexical sorting instead of ASCIIbetical
>> - only outputs namespaces that are actually used
>> - only outputs xsl:param inputFile if it's used
>> - don't make separate templates if there is only 1
>> - link to shared libxml and libxslt libraries by default
>> - add library version info to --version output
>> - add directory argument for ls; exit status indicates
>> failure/success instead of file count
>> - stop using old SAX1 interface, xmlstarlet will now link with a
>> libxml configured --without-sax1 and --without-legacy
>>
>> Noam
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmlstar-devel mailing list
>> xml...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlstar-devel
>>