Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Aleksandar I. <ale...@iv...>]

On 04/05/2011 02:58 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> Aleksandar Ivanisevic<ale...@iv...>  writes:
>
>> I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a
>> patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a
>> political issue I've missed?
>
> A political issue about the binary name or about using rpmforge? Either

Both, don't know ;)

> way I don't think there is. If you, as a Redhat user, think that using
> the rpmforge packages make sense, then I guess we should do that.

Probably a note in the README or something along those lines should 
suffice, but I could continue creating packages, its really only < 10 
mins work to rebuild. I think Dag Wieers, the master of rpmforge 
personally uses xmlstarlet so it gets updated there really fast.