From: Noam P. <npo...@us...> - 2011-04-05 01:42:02
|
Dagobert Michelsen <da...@op...> writes: > Hi Rowan, > > Am 04.04.2011 um 03:14 schrieb row...@us...: >> I realised it makes more sense to just use XMLStarlet (or maybe a >> trimmed-down version for speed reasons). There isn't much to trim from XMLStarlet itself, the bulk of the code and run time is in libxml. > Sure, I'll forward your mail to xmlstar-devel@ where I would recommend > you also subscribe to. Maybe the other developers (and notable Noam here) > have a suggestion on how you could help? > >> Like yourself I have very limited and sporadic free-time, and also I am not >> very experienced with C (yet) as Perl/shell-scripting/PHP/etc have been >> my forté more, but so far I've not found C too foreign, but I'm certainly not >> a C guru... The feature requests tracker has some ideas that are worth pursuing, or since you mentioned you were working on a framework maybe you have some cool ideas of your own. If your lack of C experience gets in the way I am willing to help with that. Another thing that really needs to get done is updating the documentation. Right now we don't even have the makefile rules to generate it. Noam |