Re: [Xmlstar-devel] XMLStarlet 1.1.0 Released

[Noam P. <npo...@us...>]

Aleksandar Ivanisevic <ale...@iv...> writes:

> I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a 
> patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a 
> political issue I've missed?

A political issue about the binary name or about using rpmforge? Either
way I don't think there is. If you, as a Redhat user, think that using
the rpmforge packages make sense, then I guess we should do that.

Noam