From: Aleksandar I. <ale...@iv...> - 2011-04-04 10:09:48
|
Hm, don't know where I was looking but rpmforge already contains xmlstarlet and they are pretty good in updating it, i.e. they have already pushed 1.0.1. update this morning when I asked. I don't see a point in me uploading EL5 rpms, except that rpmforge has a patch renaming the binary from 'xml' to 'xmlstarlet'. Or is there a political issue I've missed? On 04/04/2011 10:53 AM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry I've missed a few versions, real life got in the way :( > I have uploaded RHEL/CentOS5 RPMS for 1.1.0 now. > > I will also send a suggestion to rpmforge so that it carries it, for a > bit more visibility. > > regards, > > On 04/04/2011 02:04 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> I just released version 1.1.0 >> >> - bug fix for BSD/OSX: check that O_BINARY is declared before >> #including io.h (Bug 3211822) >> - select improvements >> - add --elif and --else options >> - sorting on multiple fields >> - correct (for English) lexical sorting instead of ASCIIbetical >> - only outputs namespaces that are actually used >> - only outputs xsl:param inputFile if it's used >> - don't make separate templates if there is only 1 >> - link to shared libxml and libxslt libraries by default >> - add library version info to --version output >> - add directory argument for ls; exit status indicates >> failure/success instead of file count >> - stop using old SAX1 interface, xmlstarlet will now link with a >> libxml configured --without-sax1 and --without-legacy >> >> Noam >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix >> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; >> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and >> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlstar-devel mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlstar-devel >> |