From: André K. <ak...@la...> - 2010-11-29 21:43:07
|
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 6:55 PM, André Kaplan <ak...@la...> > wrote: >> Is there a reason with xmlstarlet is linked statically? >> >> Regards, >> André > > According to > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=820996&group_id=66612&atid=515109 > >> I'm not planning to support linking with shared libraries. >> I think having it statically liked make it self contained, >> and easier >> to handle for a user. >> It also helps to avoid incomatibility problems in cases when >> shared libraries are upgraded. Binaries which are released >> pass regression testing with particular version of libxml2 >> and libxslt. > >> Thanks >> --MG > > Although given that distro (eg Debian's, probably others') packages > link with shared libraries, > perhaps insisting on static linking isn't worthwhile. While I understand the need for static linking under certain circumstances, I'd actually prefer to make a choice. I think I've seen --enable-static options in configure. I'd really appreciate it for xmlstarlet. Regards, André |