Re: [xmlrpcflash-development] Fwd: FW: XMLRPC - Added Event Model

[Ed C. <ed...@gr...>]

Thanks Chad!

Interesting...  So, as far as standards go, which is proper?

Really, all I care about is how zope is going to do it, as all my work
will involve the big Z.

-e-

On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Chad Spicer wrote:

> Ed :: I checked the AS for getMember and there is no provision for
> <params> or <param> See code below from xml-rpc.as
>
> function GetMember ( Arg1 )
> {
>     if (this.type == 'struct') {
>
>        for (var i in this.value) {
>
>            if (this.value[i].name == Arg1)
>               return this.value[i].value.value;
>
>        }
>
>        return null;
>
>     }
>
>     if (this.type == 'array') {
>
>        return this.value[Arg1].value;
>
>     }
>
>     return null;
> }
>
>
> Now if you simply take out the <params> & <param> of the
> responseexample.xml
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <methodResponse>
> 	<struct>
> 		<member>
> 			<name>what</name>
> 			<value><string>gotoAndStop</string></value>
> 		</member>
> 		<member>
> 			<name>frame</name>
> 			<value><int>10</int></value>
> 		</member>
> 	</struct>
> </methodResponse>
>
>
> you get from the flash client...
>
> GetResults(): Finished Parsing
> Transmit successfull.
> accessing /what/ field
> gotoAndStop
>
>
> So provisions must be included in getMember or the response must be
> simplified.
>
> I hope that helps. Let me know if tis unclear
>
> Chad Spicer :: Leadbased & ViewArt.network
>
> On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 02:14  AM, Ed Colmar wrote:
>
> > <xml-rpcflash_0_5_modified_tests.zip>

-- 
Green Graphics   :::   Print and Web Design   :::   510.923.0000