Well, geesh, that doesn't sound good at all!
Is it that this project is idle and no one is looking at the bug fixes? or
that the bugs are in dispute?
If I use marquee, and I still might since the Apache codebase not so
wonderful to me, would you care to share your bug fixes?
I'm holding off on deciding between the two for a few weeks, so I hope to
hear more from the Marquee mailing list, especially about getting bug fixes
made.
I've got the code under eclipse, and it hit me with 60 odd warnings that
I've fixed on my local copy, and I'm debating emplacing log4j has the
logging mechanism in my copy too, additionally I'll probably setup a few
Junit tests as I start to get up to speed on the code too. I really hate
the idea of "going it alone" with a codebase like this, but...
Regards
John Volkar
-----Original Message-----
From: Paolo Campanella [mailto:pa...@mi...]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Volkar, John
Cc: xml...@li...
Subject: Re: [Xmlrpc-users] Selecting a java XML-RPC implementation
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:33:40 -0500
"Volkar, John" <Joh...@mc...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to decide between the Apache XML-RPC and Marquee. I prefer
> the Marquee codebase as it looks cleaner to me, but am worried about
> it's active development.
>
> Is anyone using this in production code?
I'm using Marquee in production, and although it works fine mostly, I've
regretted it ever since because of the impossibility of getting bugfixes
approved, etc. It taught me an important lesson: always look at the list
archive of a project before using its code in a project...
Bye
Paolo
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.
|
