I'm currently working in a project where the interface is already defined.
The methodNames does not have any dots included. It only says <methodName>MyMethod</methodName> for example.
I get this error message:
redstone.xmlrpc.XmlRpcDispatcher writeError
WARNING: Invalid method name format
I tried adding an interceptor that prefixed methodname if it didn't have any package, but the message stops before getting to any interceptors. The check is in XmlRpcDispatcher. Can i work around this without modifying the source code of redstone?
Even though it is a normal convention to use dots, it should not be required when using the redstone package for building server implementations. According to the XML-RPC spec it is allowed: http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec
thanks
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I'm currently working in a project where the interface is already defined.
The methodNames does not have any dots included. It only says <methodName>MyMethod</methodName> for example.
I get this error message:
redstone.xmlrpc.XmlRpcDispatcher writeError
WARNING: Invalid method name format
I tried adding an interceptor that prefixed methodname if it didn't have any package, but the message stops before getting to any interceptors. The check is in XmlRpcDispatcher. Can i work around this without modifying the source code of redstone?
Even though it is a normal convention to use dots, it should not be required when using the redstone package for building server implementations. According to the XML-RPC spec it is allowed: http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec
thanks
Guess this thread got overlooked, the solution is here in another thread:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xmlrpc/forums/forum/79303/topic/2569828