From: Tony G. <Ton...@Su...> - 2006-07-25 10:04:50
|
Teus Benschop <te...@te...> writes: > Tony Graham wrote: > Teus Benschop <te...@te...> writes: > Thanks for the support. It now formats the xsl-fo document without even one error. > > That's good. Does it also work without '--compat'? > > Without --compat it gives a couple of errors: > > [teus@localhost parallelbible]$ xmlroff document.fo > > (process:8108): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo-fo-error: Cannot rewrite fo:block content.Object path: /FoTree[1]/root[1]/page-sequence[1]/static-content[2]/table[1]/table-body[1]/table-row[1]/table-cell[3]/block[1] > Object path: /FoTree[1]/root[1]/page-sequence[1]/static-content[2]/table[1]/table-body[1]/table-row[1]/table-cell[3]/block[1] > > (process:8108): libfo-CRITICAL **: fo-fo-error: Cannot rewrite fo:block content.Object path: /FoTree[1]/root[1]/page-sequence[1]/static-content[3]/table[1]/table-body[1]/table-row[1]/table-cell[3]/block[1] > Object path: /FoTree[1]/root[1]/page-sequence[1]/static-content[3]/table[1]/table-body[1]/table-row[1]/table-cell[3]/block[1] xmlroff is not coping with the fo:retrieve-marker and fo:leader. I don't know why. ... > You know what: Because of your use of Pango, it formats the Unicode Hebrew better than XEP does. > > Music to my ears. Using Pango has meant a lot of work at various times, so > it's nice to know that it also pays off at times. > > Pls. keep using it, because there is no renderer equal to Pango in the area > of Unicode rendering. And Pango is open, so that people can contribute code > to it that deals with otherwise overlooked minority languages. That was the original motivation: as Pango adds support for new scripts, xmlroff adds support for new scripts with (hopefully) no effort on our part. Regards, Tony. |