Re: [xmlroff] What changes to FoXmlDoc?

[Tony G. <Ton...@Su...>]

Stefan Seefeld <se...@sy...> writes:
> Tony Graham wrote:
...
>> The short form of my question is, is it better to:
>>  - Make separate 'constructors':
>>       fo_xml_doc_new_from_filename (...)
>>       fo_xml_doc_new_from_memory (...)
>
> Yes !

Done.

You'll also appreciate, I hope, the changes done to
libfo/fo-xslt-transformer.[ch].

Regards,


Tony.