Re: [xmlroff] PangoXSL license?

[Tony G. <Ton...@Su...>]

Stefan Seefeld <se...@sy...> writes:
> Tony Graham wrote:
>> If it could be relicensed, then it could be included in the xmlroff
>> distribution.
>
> I'm not sure I understand how it can make a difference license-wise
> whether you bundle PangoXSL and xmlroff into the same package or not.
> As long as the licenses are compatible, your package can include code
> distributed with as many different licenses as you want.
>
> Licenses typically talk about 'use' and 'link' etc., and that isn't
> affected at all by how you package things.

I think I finally understand your point.

So how would you propose PangoXSL be bundled with xmlroff?

How would it work for the SRPM package?

Regards,


Tony.