Re: [xmlroff] Debian xmlroff package

[Noah S. <ns...@gm...>]

Are there any Debian users on the list willing to make an ITP (Intent
To Package) for this software and ultimately becoming the downstream
maintainer of the package?

Thanks,
Noah

On 1/30/06, Tony Graham <Ton...@su...> wrote:
> Noah Slater <ns...@gm...> writes:
> > I have been reading about xmlroff with great interest. Everywhere I
> > looked seemed to state that xmlroff relied on non free libraries and
> > hence i discounted it original as I am not prepared to tolerate this.
>
> That hasn't been the case for quite a while.
>
> Looks like I need to make that more obvious.
>
> > However, it is with great excitement that I read this is no longer the
> > case. All that remains to be asked is if or when this great piece of
> > software will appear packaged in Debian's repositories?
>
> I don't know.  I personally don't use Debian, so I would have to rely on
> someone else to package it.
>
> If it were available, we could point to it from the "Ports" page at
> http://xmlroff.org/ports.html.
>
> > Thanks so much!
>
> np.  It's always a pleasure when people are enthusiastic about xmlroff.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tony.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi=
les
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> xmlroff-list mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlroff-list
>


--
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman