Re: [xmlroff] Re: xmlroff-list digest, Vol 1 #146 - 3 msgs

[Tony G. <Ton...@Su...>]

Bruno Sadiez <bru...@ya...> writes:
> Good news: it works and it works screamingly fast !
> 112 invoices per minutes on a pentium 1.6 Ghz laptop
> which is really great. (compared to 15-20 invoices per
> minute with FOP)

Cool!

> 1) As expected there seems to be memory leaks.
>
> here's an very small excerpt of what Valgrind is
> reporting:

What did you have to do to set up xmlroff to run with valgrind?

> 2)The  invoices are really bigger than those obtained
> with FOP.  63,7 KB compared to  5.6 KB for the same
> invoice.

The fonts are embedded in the PDF.

I have an impression that recent libgnomeprint has some control for
not embedding fonts, but I haven't had time to follow up on the idea.

> 3) Some features seem to be unsupported. No
> header/footer and some of the information has vanished
> (name and address of the customer for instance). I'll
> check on the web site for the unsupported features.
> I hope there is a way to solve those problems.

Patches are welcome.

If you want help understanding any part of xmlroff, just ask.

> Thank you Stefan and Tony for your help.

No problem.

Regards,


Tony.