Re: [xmlroff] Another specfile change

[Tim W. <tw...@re...>]

On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:41:38PM +0000, Tony Graham wrote:

> Tim Waugh <tw...@re...> writes:
> ...
> > But now xmlroff immediately segfaults. :-/
> >
> > #0  0x069dd771 in gnome_print_job_print_to_file (job=3D0x0,
> >     output=3D0x8dd7768 "layout.pdf") at gnome-print-job.c:1181
> > #1  0x080af58e in fo_doc_gp_get_type ()
> > #2  0x00878b12 in g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
> > #3  0x080ac00f in main ()
> >
> > 0x069dd771 in gnome_print_job_print_to_file (job=3D0x0,
> >     output=3D0x8dd7768 "layout.pdf") at gnome-print-job.c:1181
> > 1181                    gnome_print_config_set (job->config, "Settings.=
Transport.Backend",    "file");
>=20
> I have seen this recently, but none of the xmlroff testsuite files
> fail this way, so I can't reproduce it.  Can you provide yet another
> FO file?

Oddly enough, I can't get this to happen now.  I'm afraid I didn't
make a note of which FO file triggered it. :-(

Tim.
*/