From: Tim W. <tw...@re...> - 2005-03-11 11:06:54
|
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:16:09PM +0000, Tony Graham wrote: > I would like to be able to say that in principle the return_child > should not be null, but it's been so long that I can't be sure. > Obviously it is null in that instance. FWIW, making the change I suggested does seem to fix the segfault, although some parts of the output seem to be on the wrong page (in particular a white-space-treatment='preserve' figure seems to have been split across to pages, both parts being at the top of the page) . Not sure if that's a separate problem. > Can you send me your file, although I can't say when I will get to > look at it. [Sent in private mail.] Tim. */ |