From: Tony G. <Ton...@Su...> - 2005-03-10 23:15:51
|
Tim Waugh <tw...@re...> writes: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:49:06PM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > >> That's what I tried to start with, and it gets me a segfault. :-) > > Here's where it faults, by the way: > > #0 0x080bd4da in fo_area_size_request_default (child=0xa62ac18) > at fo-area.c:1985 > 1985 while (return_child->next_part != child_original_next_part) > > return_child is 0x0, child is 0xa62ac18 and child_original_next_part > is 0xa535e58. > > Looks like it probably needs to be something like > > while (return_child->next_part && return_child->next_part != ...) I would like to be able to say that in principle the return_child should not be null, but it's been so long that I can't be sure. Obviously it is null in that instance. Can you send me your file, although I can't say when I will get to look at it. Regards, Tony. |