From: Tim W. <tw...@re...> - 2005-03-10 18:22:42
|
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:49:06PM +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > That's what I tried to start with, and it gets me a segfault. :-) Here's where it faults, by the way: #0 0x080bd4da in fo_area_size_request_default (child=0xa62ac18) at fo-area.c:1985 1985 while (return_child->next_part != child_original_next_part) return_child is 0x0, child is 0xa62ac18 and child_original_next_part is 0xa535e58. Looks like it probably needs to be something like while (return_child->next_part && return_child->next_part != ...) Tim. */ |