Re: [xmlroff] ...->sprintf (...)

[Tony G. <Ton...@Su...>]

Tim Waugh <tw...@re...> writes:
...
> It's because sprintf is a macro (I have -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in my
> CFLAGS).
>
> Names of C functions that may be implemented as macros cannot be used
> as user functions or variables, and that includes this struct member.
>
> I think it needs to be changed to something other than 'sprintf'.

Changed to 'print_sprintf' (which parallels existing 'debug_sprintf'
name).

Regards,


Tony.