From: Tim W. <tw...@re...> - 2005-03-09 16:09:33
|
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > I'm not sure that this is an easy task. > However, I agree that docbook-to-pdf processing provides a nice > (and wildly popular) use case. In this light, would it be possible > to set up a benchmark, i.e. turning the test suite into a progress > meter so people can see how xmlroff gets closer to that goal ? I think that once it is possible to process DocBook documents at all using xmlroff, it will become apparent quite quickly which bits are missing. Hopefully this will speed up the rate at which developers discover and contribute to xmlroff. :-) There is an interesting file shipped with xmlroff: /usr/share/xml/libfo-0.3.1/libfo-compat.xsl Unfortunately, I tried applying that stylesheet to a docbook-xsl-generated XSL-FO file but didn't notice much difference in the warnings and errors generated. The particular sorts of DocBook documents I'm interested in getting xmlroff going with are the Fedora Core documentation manuals. (These actually contain a subset of DocBook tags, not the full set.) Tim. */ |