From: Tim W. <tw...@re...> - 2005-03-09 15:43:44
|
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:26:46PM +0000, Tony Graham wrote: > I'm afraid that RPM spec files are just voodoo to me (and not my > favourite form of voodoo at that). If it weren't for you, we wouldn't > have them at all.=20 Heh :-) > Thank you for your interest in providing and using > the RPM spec files. Can you now verify whether the patch below adds > the incantation in the right place? Yes, that looks right. I've not been following xmlroff very much until just recently I'm afraid, what with other commitments. I'm now looking at it again to see what it can do now that it couldn't last time I looked. :-) I realise that it can't process the docbook-xsl FO stylesheet output yet, but I was wonder if it's possible to make a simple stylesheet for DocBook to XSL-FO that xmlroff *would* be able to process, either right now or in the not too distant future. What do you think? Tim. */ |