From: Tony G. <Ton...@Su...> - 2004-10-06 15:30:17
|
Stefan Seefeld <se...@sy...> writes: ... >>>Just so that occasional visitors that want to watch the progress >>>in terms of feature coverage could get a quick impression. >> A good idea, certainly. Would the static test result summary page >> suffice for starters? > > Sure. As long as it is not too much out of sync. One thing I hope we > could improve over the current website is to make sure the information > correctly reflects the current status, i.e. at least the state from > the current release, may be even from current 'snapshots'. Having to > update lots of different places is annoying for you, so I hope with > some scripts we can automatize that. > Running the tests should be something that can be done automatically, > and so should be the generation of a little report (html, xml, rss, whatever). I'm attaching a copy of the current summary page. The tests are run and the report is generated using a combination of shell scripts, Perl scripts, and XSLT stylesheets. Regards, Tony. |