From: Steve C. <g3c...@cd...> - 2004-08-27 04:05:48
|
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Tony Graham wrote: > I am considering making a new package for the new PangoPDF because the > name no longer really applies and because removing all the old source > files will still leave their directories in the CVS tree for no good > reason. PangoPDF could also do with a new description in > pangopdf.pc.in. Any ideas? Why not just distribute a patch against mainstream Pango? (and also patch against libgnomeprint for the XSL attributes, later) It makes it easier to update for new changes in the mainstream version, and we're not going to fork this thing forever, right? > Please test out xmlroff and let the list know how you get on. Let me guess, you are using old versions of the autotools :) Or for whatever reason, mine doesn't generate the libtool and ltmain.sh scripts --- no matter, I copied them over from the release version of pangopdf and it builds. Tomorrow I will check out how it works. Thanks for all your work Tony, -- Steve Cheng 鄭君博 docbook2X: <URL:http://docbook2x.sourceforge.net/> |