From: Tony G. <xm...@me...> - 2004-08-23 11:32:53
|
At 23 Aug 2004 00:18 -0400, Tony Graham wrote: ... > One question that needs answering is whether the differences are small > enough that the XSL attributes and the rendering functions can be > tacked on to the xmlroff tree such that there's really no need to > modify Pango at all. The answer to that question is that the different licenses of Pango and xmlroff mean that something based on Pango code shouldn't go under the xmlroff license, but IANAL. Regards, Tony. |